Comments on: Kodak takes Kodachrome away

By: Royce Bair - free stock photos blog

Royce Bair - free stock photos blog — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:17:19 +0000

Although I no longer use Kodachrome, it’s sad to see the product go away. I have many slides that still are hanging in there with their “…nice bright colors”.

By: readyphotosite

readyphotosite — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:42:10 +0000

RIP Kodachrome.. i’m sure that very soon we will see a corresponding photo effect available in the image editors. there are tons of polaroid effects today, so we may expect the same for the Kodachrome

By: photography video tutorials

photography video tutorials — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:19:09 +0000

Thanks for your info. This is very useful blog.

By: David

David — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:51:03 +0000

I’ve still got a few rolls of this, going off in a cupboard. It was good stuff and you knew your total costs were covered because you paid for processing when you bought the film. Now we are all digital, it has no place. The K41 process is massive in comparison to E6. Was it 19 baths? You had to send the film to P.O.Box 2 in Wimbledon but I think they forwarded it to France. I’ve just checked the cupboard. I have Super 8 Kodachrome 40 as well. Oh well. I should have used it earlier.

By: singapore photographers

singapore photographers — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:48:20 +0000

Sigh…guess its not economical to produce it anymore…

By: Zonker Harris

Zonker Harris — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:09:27 +0000

At the railroad, on Father’s Day, we used to use Polaroid instant film to take a snap of Dads and their kids in the Engineers seat of a locomotive. We gave them the photo free, as a souvenir of their visit. But, last year we could only get 8 packs from Keeble & Schuchat, it was the last of the stock that they had. (This year, dad’s got a taste of beer or root beer instead of a photo.) Those were the days.