<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kodak takes Kodachrome away</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/</link>
	<description>Digital Photography Geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 12:08:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Arne Strand</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-300</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Arne Strand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 11:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-300</guid>
		<description>So sad, I prefer Ekakrome much will be much missed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So sad, I prefer Ekakrome much will be much missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Canvas Printmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Canvas Printmaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 23:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t say that I&#039;m overly surprised - even E6 is on it&#039;s way out. Sign of the times I&#039;m afraid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m overly surprised &#8211; even E6 is on it&#8217;s way out. Sign of the times I&#8217;m afraid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: actor headshots</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>actor headshots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 04:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-285</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very sad story from Kodak.. I know Kodak will come back for a much better product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a very sad story from Kodak.. I know Kodak will come back for a much better product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 15:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-279</guid>
		<description>rip.... hang in there kodak</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rip&#8230;. hang in there kodak</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stevewckrt</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>stevewckrt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Nov 2010 05:57:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-264</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your info. This is very useful blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your info. This is very useful blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gem</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>Gem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Its a shame that we have seen the decline of the film. I used to love spending time in the dark room working on my pictures. It doesn&#039;t seem to be the same editing pictures whilst sat on the computer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a shame that we have seen the decline of the film. I used to love spending time in the dark room working on my pictures. It doesn&#8217;t seem to be the same editing pictures whilst sat on the computer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lighting - Ellen</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Lighting - Ellen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 10:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Thank you for the information you provided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the information you provided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Harte - Photographer Leeds</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Harte - Photographer Leeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 22:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-247</guid>
		<description>I thought they had taken it away a few years ago. I know there was uproar about it. Maybe if there is another uproar it will be reinstated again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought they had taken it away a few years ago. I know there was uproar about it. Maybe if there is another uproar it will be reinstated again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coolpix Camera Review</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Coolpix Camera Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 09:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Nice article, thanks for sharing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article, thanks for sharing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Royce Bair - free stock photos blog</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Royce Bair - free stock photos blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 00:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Although I no longer use Kodachrome, it&#039;s sad to see the product go away. I have many slides that still are hanging in there with their &quot;...nice bright colors&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although I no longer use Kodachrome, it&#8217;s sad to see the product go away. I have many slides that still are hanging in there with their &#8220;&#8230;nice bright colors&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: readyphotosite</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>readyphotosite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-219</guid>
		<description>RIP Kodachrome.. i&#039;m sure that very soon we will see a corresponding photo effect available in the image editors. there are tons of polaroid effects today, so we may expect the same for the Kodachrome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP Kodachrome.. i&#8217;m sure that very soon we will see a corresponding photo effect available in the image editors. there are tons of polaroid effects today, so we may expect the same for the Kodachrome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photography video tutorials</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>photography video tutorials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 10:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-216</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your info. This is very useful blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your info. This is very useful blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-213</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-213</guid>
		<description>I’ve still got a few rolls of this, going off in a cupboard.  It was good stuff and you knew your total costs were covered because you paid for processing when you bought the film.  Now we are all digital, it has no place.  The K41 process is massive in comparison to E6.  Was it 19 baths?  You had to send the film to P.O.Box 2 in Wimbledon but I think they forwarded it to France.  I’ve just checked the cupboard.  I have Super 8 Kodachrome 40 as well.  Oh well.  I should have used it earlier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve still got a few rolls of this, going off in a cupboard.  It was good stuff and you knew your total costs were covered because you paid for processing when you bought the film.  Now we are all digital, it has no place.  The K41 process is massive in comparison to E6.  Was it 19 baths?  You had to send the film to P.O.Box 2 in Wimbledon but I think they forwarded it to France.  I’ve just checked the cupboard.  I have Super 8 Kodachrome 40 as well.  Oh well.  I should have used it earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: singapore photographers</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-208</link>
		<dc:creator>singapore photographers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-208</guid>
		<description>Sigh...guess its not economical to produce it anymore...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh&#8230;guess its not economical to produce it anymore&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zonker Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Zonker Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2009/06/24/kodak-kills-kodachrome/#comment-207</guid>
		<description>At the railroad, on Father&#039;s Day, we used to use Polaroid instant film to take a snap of Dads and their kids in the Engineers seat of a locomotive. We gave them the photo free, as a souvenir of their visit. But, last year we could only get 8 packs from Keeble &amp; Schuchat, it was the last of the stock that they had. (This year, dad&#039;s got a taste of beer or root beer instead of a photo.) Those were the days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the railroad, on Father&#8217;s Day, we used to use Polaroid instant film to take a snap of Dads and their kids in the Engineers seat of a locomotive. We gave them the photo free, as a souvenir of their visit. But, last year we could only get 8 packs from Keeble &amp; Schuchat, it was the last of the stock that they had. (This year, dad&#8217;s got a taste of beer or root beer instead of a photo.) Those were the days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

