<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Use of In-Camera Sharpening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/</link>
	<description>Digital Photography Geeks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:31:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: euicho</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>euicho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/#comment-162</guid>
		<description>There are two sides to this... If you sharpen in-camera, you manipulate the RAW data before converting/compressing to jpeg.  Rather than destroying detail, your camera is just interpreting the data it got off the sensor in a different way before applying it to the image.  On the other hand, the camera&#039;s processor isn&#039;t able to run as powerful a sharpening algorithm as your desktop, so it can&#039;t always employ the best sharpening.  I use slight in-camera for my jpegs because I don&#039;t want to sharpen every photo I take in Photoshop, and as Jason says, it&#039;s not enough to hurt your image.

Without getting into a pro/con RAW debate, if you sharpen in Photoshop (et al.) on a jpeg, you are working on a converted, compressed file, and sharpening will not be as effective nor as good looking, in general, as working on a RAW file, so if you&#039;re worried about it, just shoot RAW or RAW+jpeg and either see for yourself which you prefer, or just always save the raw so that if you don&#039;t like the in-camera sharpening on a photo down the road, you can go back to the original RAW!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are two sides to this&#8230; If you sharpen in-camera, you manipulate the RAW data before converting/compressing to jpeg.  Rather than destroying detail, your camera is just interpreting the data it got off the sensor in a different way before applying it to the image.  On the other hand, the camera&#8217;s processor isn&#8217;t able to run as powerful a sharpening algorithm as your desktop, so it can&#8217;t always employ the best sharpening.  I use slight in-camera for my jpegs because I don&#8217;t want to sharpen every photo I take in Photoshop, and as Jason says, it&#8217;s not enough to hurt your image.</p>
<p>Without getting into a pro/con RAW debate, if you sharpen in Photoshop (et al.) on a jpeg, you are working on a converted, compressed file, and sharpening will not be as effective nor as good looking, in general, as working on a RAW file, so if you&#8217;re worried about it, just shoot RAW or RAW+jpeg and either see for yourself which you prefer, or just always save the raw so that if you don&#8217;t like the in-camera sharpening on a photo down the road, you can go back to the original RAW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 11:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Looked on my Sony Alpha&#039;s and cant find an option on there, have I just missed it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looked on my Sony Alpha&#8217;s and cant find an option on there, have I just missed it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embassy Pro Books</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Embassy Pro Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/#comment-124</guid>
		<description>I agree, if you do it in the camera you can&#039;t revert back. I always wait until I do anything to the pic until I get on my computer that way you can save different versions of it.

But I do recommend playing with all the settings on your camera. It always you to do things with your camera you never thought you could.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, if you do it in the camera you can&#8217;t revert back. I always wait until I do anything to the pic until I get on my computer that way you can save different versions of it.</p>
<p>But I do recommend playing with all the settings on your camera. It always you to do things with your camera you never thought you could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Embassy Pro Books</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Embassy Pro Books</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>I had no idea you could do this either. You learn something new every day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no idea you could do this either. You learn something new every day!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 14. What I learned about photography this week &#8212; Lilahpops :: Plunging into Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>14. What I learned about photography this week &#8212; Lilahpops :: Plunging into Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] Use of in-camera sharpening [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Use of in-camera sharpening [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard X. Thripp</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard X. Thripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/#comment-114</guid>
		<description>Sharpening out of camera is a better practice, because in-camera sharpening is a destructive process that destroys detail. It would be like converting to black and white in-camera; you don&#039;t do it because then you can&#039;t go back to color, or in this case, you can&#039;t go back to unsharpened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharpening out of camera is a better practice, because in-camera sharpening is a destructive process that destroys detail. It would be like converting to black and white in-camera; you don&#8217;t do it because then you can&#8217;t go back to color, or in this case, you can&#8217;t go back to unsharpened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monday Links: 23-06-2008 &#124; Heaven In Black &#38; White</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Monday Links: 23-06-2008 &#124; Heaven In Black &#38; White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 12:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/#comment-112</guid>
		<description>[...] Use of In-Camera Sharpening Fotohacker The usage of Sharpening right in your camera explained. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Use of In-Camera Sharpening Fotohacker The usage of Sharpening right in your camera explained. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Bergman</title>
		<link>http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Bergman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 13:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fotohacker.com/2008/05/20/use-of-in-camera-sharpening/#comment-105</guid>
		<description>To mutter utter shame, I had no idea you could sharpen in-camera. I&#039;ve always used Photoshop for that sort of thing. Definitely gonna try this out. Thanks for the tip!
-Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To mutter utter shame, I had no idea you could sharpen in-camera. I&#8217;ve always used Photoshop for that sort of thing. Definitely gonna try this out. Thanks for the tip!<br />
-Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
